Here's the linky, http://www.gamefront.com/mass-effect-3s-advertising-was-never-the-issue/ . This a day or two old and so it maybe old news to some but what the article does is to help explain why the ASA sided with EA (When we all know they dun lied about Mass Effect) Of note is this particular snippet from the Article Basically stating that the ASA dealt with Mass Effect's advertising done via EA, the numerous Interviews, Previews and twitter statements and all those things like them, they don't count to this and Game spot helps to clarify why they made the de scion they did.[SIZE=1][/SIZE] Again this is nothing new but ultimately it boils down to one question. Do you think Game Journalists are Advertisements or are actual Journalists because if you answered the former then EA did lie to you, If you answer the later then EA didn't lie to you. As the final thing, it's a interesting point to note that this would seem to say "Yeah what ever comes out of your mouth , when it's on your private account, or isn't official advertising can be wildly extravagant to the point of lunacy but what you say with your own adverts better be truthful or else" makes you wonder if this is another reason why IGN (which I will note now I find their coverage of this who mess distasteful to say the least) and it's ilk are kept around by the big game companies.